Talk:Conwy town walls/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Hchc2009 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk • contribs • count) 18:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Nicely done.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A picture of the upper gate with the remains of its barbican would be useful if one can be found.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- I can't find one unfortunately; I agree it would be good. Ironically I was there a few months ago, but didn't know about the barbican at the time! Next time though, I'll make sure I get a decent photo of it.Hchc2009 (talk) 17:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail: