GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Voorts (talk · contribs) 20:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
I will be quick-failing this nomination. The "description" section lacks citations and there are valid {{cn}} tags. The "Popular culture" section contains seemingly random examples and the "Reception" section only discusses critiques of cookies from a nutritional perspective. Thus, while comprehensiveness is not required, I do not believe that this article "addresses the main aspects of the topic" per GA criterion 3a. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC)