Talk:Cookley

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:28, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Cookley → Cookley, Worcestershire — This village does not seam to be significantly more notable than Cookley, Suffolk. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 16:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

• Neutral - not sure, but the population of Cookley, Worcestershire is given as 2,491, whereas that of Cookley, Suffolk must be <100. I suspect that the Worcestershire village is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, but I'm not certain. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose - The Worcestershire village is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC by every criteria I can think of.
  • The village in Suffolk is so obscure no one even bothered to create a page for it until the nominator of this proposal created a short stub a few weeks ago. The article for the Worcestershire village was created in 2006.
  • "+cookley +worcestershire": About 142,000 ghits; "+cookley +suffolk": About 12,200 ghits
  • Incoming links from article space: 5 for Suffolk, 36 for Worcestershire
  • The village in Worcestershire seems to average about 100-200 page views per month. There is not much data yet for the Suffolk village, but early indications are that its traffic is more like a few per day, and well less than 100 per month.

Finally, per WP:TWODABS there really is no need for a dab page here. Why require readers searching for the one in Worcestershire with "Cookley" to go through a dab page and an extra click when the ones searching for the Suffolk village will have two clicks either way? --Born2cycle (talk) 18:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose - per Born2cycle. The Worcestershire village is a proper settlement, whereas the Suffolk one is just a few houses on a road junction.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
• If I hadn't have nominated, I probably would have opted for Weak Support fo Neutral as they are both civil parishes but the other Worcester one appears to be a bit bigger than I first thought and the article was created first. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 22:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

So perhaps you could consider withdrawing your nom? In future it would be helpful you could put in a little more thought and research before you make these proposals which are starting to become disruptive. Nancy ^talk 06:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.cookleycc.co.nr

  Triggered by \bco\.nr\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:22, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cookley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927003043/http://worcestershire.whub.org.uk/home/cs-research-census-populationreport.pdf to http://worcestershire.whub.org.uk/home/cs-research-census-populationreport.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)