Talk:Coonamit Bridge

	Australia portal Coonamit Bridge is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copy / edit tag

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Onel5969: Hi there. Just wondering what's the reason for the {{Copy edit}} tag? Please visit here, here and here to understand some of the scope of this project. Cheers :-) Rangasyd (talk) 14:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Seems unnecessary and a bit nitpicky. Only things I could see would be:

It's probably a situation where keeping the date in the heritage listing leads to a slightly nonsensical sentence ("As at 13 September 2005, the Coonamit Bridge is a Dare type timber truss bridge, and was completed in 1929")
The sentence fragments in that section - "Representative of Dare truss bridges"
possibly the fact that the history section has nothing about this bridge

They're all pretty minor things, though, which is why I left them on a first pass as well. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply