A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:24, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 4 September 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 16:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


Coptic Orthodox Church of AlexandriaCoptic Orthodox Church – By far the common name of this Church in English ([1]). Even the category for this article (Category:Coptic Orthodox Church) and the native name (Ϯⲉⲕ̀ⲕⲗⲏⲥⲓⲁ ⲛ̀ⲣⲉⲙⲛ̀ⲭⲏⲙⲓ ⲛ̀ⲟⲣⲑⲟⲇⲟⲝⲟⲥ) don't mention "of Alexandria". 92.184.105.120 (talk) 06:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Support. "Coptic Orthodox Church" is clearly the WP:COMMONNAME. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 06:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New Image for the Cathedral

edit

I have added a well-needed, updated photo for this article, that being the newly-renovated St. Mark's Cathedral as it stands today. The existing image is already 12 years old and does not reflect the current state of the cathedral. Open to discussion below if you disagree with the change. Thanks so much. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 03:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Will revert back to prior image until the new one is approved in the Commons. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 16:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality scale

edit

I have upgraded this article’s quality level to “B”, up from where it stood before at a “C”. The requisite qualifications behind a “B” rating have been met for this article. If anyone would like to discuss it through or disagree, please feel free to comment. That Coptic Guy (let's talk?) 04:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Greetings, I think there may be a little confusion on the classification.
The B-class criteria (#1) states: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. #2 states: The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. Unsourced statements and blank sections are evidence the article does not pass the criteria and needs reassessing. -- Otr500 (talk) 07:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
There's some room for growth and improvement per Otr500. I have made the move to reduce the class from B to C. Due to a lack of coverage in of some major aspects, sourcing alone will be insufficient to elevate this article to B-class. Classification is not a priority, but it is a nice benchmark. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Library 100 - Critical Approaches to Information Research

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 February 2024 and 12 June 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ssoli10 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Ssoli10 (talk) 22:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply