Confusion about Edits

edit

Hi there. Being a shiny newbie to writing Wikipedia material, I'm easily confused. In particular, I'm confused about the manner in which my writing in this article was edited. It appears that the edits were almost entirely limited to the deletion of "internal link" references, and it would appear that the deleted references were simply those for which there is currently no Wikipedia article (e.g., compare my revision of 09:29, 28 February 2007 to that of Darkest Hour 00:07, 1 March 2007). Can someone explain to me why the references were deleted? As a Wikipedia reader, I am under the impression that it's acceptable to include references to subjects for which there is currently no Wikepedia article--they show up on screen as red links instead of blue, and when you click on them, you're invited to create said article--as they amount to a suggestion that such an article should indeed be written. In addition to being confused and curious, I'd like to be sure that I'm not in violation of an established guideline or protocol. Thank you most kindly for your help. ThinkinFeller 04:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cancer

edit

What form of cancer did Harney have and is it believed to have been caused by the contamination of the land on which he lived? Badagnani 03:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Corbin Harney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Corbin Harney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Adding references, changing long quotes from his works to shorter ones

edit

I am adding references to this article. and trying to rewrite the prose into a more encyclopedic style, anyone what to help? Toandanel49 (talk) 10:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Much of this article is long quotes from his two books. I have added the books as references and I plan to cut down the long quotes to short ones with references to his two published books, what do you think?Toandanel49 (talk) 10:49, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Today I removed the code banner stated multiple issues. References and third party (secondary) sources had been added. The tone is still not very like an encyclopedia, but it is closer.Toandanel49 (talk) 13:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

List of nuclear weapons tests

edit

The list / chart of US nuclear weapons testing that is at the bottom of the article is misleading it includes the hydrogen bomb tests that were all held in the Marshall Islands, while only the much smaller atomic bombs were testing in Nevada. Can we change it? I think that it is misleading to have all those tests listed there. Toandanel49 (talk)