This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Regarding deleting the importance tag
Content Management Systems in Comparison of Content Management Systems will only be listed if there is an exsisting article about it. In the comparison are tons of negligible CM-Systems, so CoreMedia represents one of the most important in this list. In this context deleting the independent CMS Watch-Link (where CoreMedia is listed with only a few other european companies) is incomprehensible. Furthermore it is no convention that the systems have to be open source.
Last but not least I've posted this article, because I'm convinced of the system (probably like all other CMS article authors too). I'm not an employee of the company so the charge of "aggressive advertising" is inappropriate.
- The tone of the article could still be more neutral. I agree that the article should exist, but it should be a bit less an advert. Slsh (talk) 06:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)