Talk:Core (Stone Temple Pilots album)

Pages for non-singles

edit

I believe that Dead & Bloated should have its own article, seeing as it was one of the bands biggest hits, and it has also charted, I believe. Black has its own article, and Dead & Bloated has its own fan-favorite status. --Arcai, 23 September, 2008. 6:52 AM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.21.39 (talk) 10:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I recreated the pages for Dead & Bloated and Crackerman, but they could use some expansion, so I marked them as stubs. 72.153.65.252 (talk) 03:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Black has been covered and noted by independent, reliable sources, as seen in the references section of that page. There is no similar notability for these STP songs, and I have reverted them back to redirects. Tarc (talk) 13:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Even if Dead & Bloated and Crackerman don't have any reliable sources to constitute their own articles, couldn't there at least be some mentioning of the two songs' use today? Maybe there could be another section on this page that at least gives them some detail, such as live performances, radio airplay, and charting. Even though these two songs weren't released as singles, they are still well known and at least deserve to have some explanation of them. I might just do that, create such a section on this page and make the articles redirect to that one section. I will also find reliable sources to add to this page so that the new content will deserve to stay.Almax999 (talk) 19:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Song backgrounds section

edit

The Song backgrounds section, just so everyone knows, is a separate section that was created in order to merge Dead & Bloated and Crackerman into the article. No other songs from the album should be listed there unless they are properly sourced, like the above two songs each have at least one source; more sources would be better, though. I noticed that some recent edits that were reverted had that kind of information for every song on the album. There is no problem in having that in the article if that information can be properly sourced. And while I'm on the subject of sourcing material, I realized that the only sources listed in the references section of this page are for the two song backgrounds that I mentioned above. Please find more sources if you can, as I know that most stuff on this page needs sourcing, such as awards won or chart positions.--74.163.253.149 (talk) 00:34, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Inlay

edit

I would like to see the inlay added about the dead and bloated nation. 166.195.104.104 (talk) 18:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)LayneReply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Core (Stone Temple Pilots album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Core (Stone Temple Pilots album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

1994 ?

edit

If Core was released in 1992 then how was STP considered a "new band" in 1994 in this passage "...band was simultaneously voted Best New Band by Rolling Stone's readers and Worst New Band by the magazine's music critics in January 1994...."

Are we sure that we have that year correct? FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 14:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Chart ranking caused sales or sales caused ranking?

edit

The lede says, "The album peaked at No. 3 on the Billboard charts and was certified 8x platinum by the RIAA, making it the band's best-selling album of their career." Wouldn't it have been the other way round, i.e., the high sales were the cause of it going high in the charts? Nurg (talk) 09:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply