Talk:Coria (Corbridge)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / Classical C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Coriosopitum is by no means the universally accepted name for Roman Corbridge and in fact has no greater claim than the old Corstopitum, favoured (to the point of being on road signs) until the last couple of decades of the 20th century. Andrew Breeze has even suggested Corsobetum, but he is in a minority of one on that. The Vindolanda tablets have more than one mention of Coria, which Rivet and Smith considered before opting for Coriosopitum, and that has gained wide modern acceptance (this whole mess is summarised in the latest edition of the Handbook to the Roman Wall, p.416). Given the dispute over the ancient name, an article about Roman Corbridge would be much better under the heading of, say, Roman Corbridge, which should mention this uncertainty and have disambiguation links pointing to it. The point of Wikipedia is surely objectivity and opting for one disputed name over another could be seen as compromising that.Mcbishop 17:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

On reflection, I think you're probably right. A reconstructed form may not be the best way to go. I chose it as it seems to be favoured by English Heritage in their guide. You could argue for Corstopitum on grounds of familiarity, but the Vindolanda tablets reference seems to be pretty definite. I have moved the article to Coria (Corbridge). However, if discussions conclude that even this is still too contraversial, the form to match other similar articles would be Corbridge Roman Town. Walgamanus 14:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Can we go for Corbridge Roman Town then, please ? At the moment, Dere Street runs through Coria and Stanegate through Corstopitum. I can appreciate that 'Corstopitum' is probably no longer tenable, and if a new definitely correct name is established, then that should be adopted. But if all we have is a view that the full name was 'Tribal centre of the Xs', then opting for 'tribal centre' alone doesn't seem to have much more going for it than any other fuller 'reconstruction'. The Vindolanda tablets aren't that conclusive; using only the first element of the full name seems to me vaguely analogous to people living near the various Kirby Stephens, Lonsdales, Kendals of N Lancs/ S Lakes refering to those places as 'Kirby'. --Rjccumbria (talk) 14:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic