Talk:Cork Courthouse, Anglesea Street/GA1
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Xx78900 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Shearonink (talk · contribs) 00:11, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Will do a GA Review of this article over the next few days. Shearonink (talk) 00:11, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for the review. I've addressed your issues as outlined below.
- The lead section sentences have been merged in places, and I've replaced a few "it"s.
- The sentence you identified (rightly) as being poorly written has been changed.
- Translation added to source 1, which I think is the only Irihs language source.
- Ref #9 replaced with archived copy of the resource.
- Added wikilinks to all Irish Examiner and Irish Times articles, and developed one from an auto-cite to a proper news reference.
- I think that's everything - please let me know if there are any more changes to be made, and thanks again for the review! Xx78900 (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Shearonink are you still interested in this review? Just thought I'd give you a ping as it's been a week, I imagine it's just slipped off your radar. Thanks. Xx78900 (talk) 09:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Xx78900 So sorry for the delay. Thanks for the reminder-ping & all those changes above. I'll go over the article one more time today to make sure I haven't missed anything and finish assessing. Shearonink (talk) 16:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- A few more things:
- This sentence seems to be missing the article "the" before the word "complex" - The total cost of the renovations was €34.8 million, and added a new structure to complex,
- I think one of these two templates could/should be added to the article, either {{Use British English|date=January 2023}} or {{Use Hiberno-English|date=January 2023}}. Sometimes folks come along and mistakenly "correct" spellings, like "colour" to "color" and so on. As soon as these 2 "A few minor things" are taken care of/responded to, I will finish up this Review and intend promote this article to GA status. Shearonink (talk) 16:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Both done now. Xx78900 (talk) 09:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Shearonink are you still interested in this review? Just thought I'd give you a ping as it's been a week, I imagine it's just slipped off your radar. Thanks. Xx78900 (talk) 09:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- I am working my way through the article's text, so far so good, but -
- What is meant by this sentence - "During its construction, care was taken impact the existing walls of the Model School as little as was could feasibly be done."
- The above sentence needs to be corrected. Shearonink (talk) 04:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Before moving forward, I think the lead needs some adjusting for style. There's a little too much of "It", the sentences seem a little short and a little too simple. Shearonink (talk) 17:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Lead section - fine, but see 1A comment on style. Shearonink (talk) 17:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Layout - fine.
- Words to watch - fine.
- Fiction & List parameters are not applicable. Shearonink (talk) 04:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- No original research found, all statements are referenced/sourced. Shearonink (talk) 02:11, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- I have found a couple of issues with the references.
- Since this is the English WP, any references that resolve to Irish language content need to be marked as such, see Ref #1-https://www.courts.ie/ga/teach-c%C3%BAirte-chorca%C3%AD-sr%C3%A1id-anglesea
- Ref #9/with the URL http://www.iar.ie/Archive.shtml?IE%20CCCA/NS/MS isn't working
- The Irish Times has a Wikipedia article. It should be Wikilinked within the refs that cite it. Shearonink (talk) 04:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have found a couple of issues with the references.
- C. It contains no original research:
- All the statements are sourced. Shearonink (talk) 02:11, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- Ran Earwig's copyvio tool - no copyvios found. Shearonink (talk) 01:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Focused on the topic. Shearonink (talk) 01:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- ^...without being mired in details. Shearonink (talk) 01:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Very straightforward and factual. Shearonink (talk) 04:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- No edit wars. Shearonink (talk) 01:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Images are all fine for this parameter. Shearonink (talk) 02:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Images are relevant and have good captions. Shearonink (talk) 02:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Have found a few correctable issues. As soon as they are adjusted/corrected, I'll re-assess at that time. Shearonink (talk) 04:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Just one minor adjustment, that missing article (it's mentioned above in our first Comments/"A few more things" section) plus a suggestion (not a requirement) about the variant English template. As soon as those are responded to I'll finish up. Shearonink (talk) 05:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Have found a few correctable issues. As soon as they are adjusted/corrected, I'll re-assess at that time. Shearonink (talk) 04:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: