Talk:Cormac Mác Shamhradháin

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I propose that Cormac Mág Shamhradháin be merged into Cormac Mác Shamhradháin or vice versa. They are very simlar articles about the same person. There is even extensive copy-paste between one and the other. --Stfg (talk) 12:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

One is the son of the other as should be obvious from reading the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.65.33.67 (talk) 17:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oops, I must have been tired. Thanks for pointing it out. --Stfg (talk) 18:04, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply