Talk:Corning, California

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

There are also gangs in Corning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.81.178.126 (talk) 01:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


Unspotted vandalism??

edit

Can this edit be verified? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.100.121.217 (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Population Variance?

edit

I'm just wondering why there is such a large population variance, for the City of Corning, between the figure reported in the last Census...and the figure showing in the right hand margin overview. In examining the growth between the 2000 and 2010 Census, the population reported in the overview--which would be the growth between 2010 and 2013/14--doesn't make sense to me. (You can find the population reported in the last Census in the first paragraph on Corning.)

If the figure in the overview is correct, does anyone know the reason why the population more than doubled over the course of a three to four year period? Thanks...

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Corning, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply