Talk:Cornus amomum
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 September 2018 and 17 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MaritimeSquash4.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Topp4485, Keel4991, Jordan Wilson, Darius Sanders, Chou5361. Peer reviewers: Welc7242, Noperti, Morgankerry.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cornus amomum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070917141349/http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/esb/Wetplant/shrubscont.htm to http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/esb/Wetplant/shrubscont.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC) Hello! This is a short, sweet and straight to the point article! Perhaps more technical information in regard to this species can be added to bring more depth to the article. Regardless, good work! Whit5022 (talk) 02:39, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review
editTo make improvements maybe add more information, It is very short and little is covered about it except its description and classification, which are both very well written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RebekahHemingway (talk • contribs) 17:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is still very small and needs an extensive amount of information to be added. The information so far is well worded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morgankerry (talk • contribs) 22:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
This article gives the basic information of the species, but I think that it should have more information on the demographics and biology of the species. Thi will allow for a stronger and better structured article. This comes down to it requiring more research. --Noperti (talk) 20:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)