Talk:Corporate crime

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mfellahi3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Notes

I am unsure if Corporate crime should be me merged with Corporate abuse or be left alone; either way some sort of correlation exists and needs to be addressed. For now I will only place a sublink to both places.

Also SEE: |Category:Corporate abuse|

what should be the proper action?

RoboAction 04:48, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Corporate terrorism?

The Monsanto article links to corporate terrorism, which redirects to this page. But the page is entirely vacant of any such content. Ken 16:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

No word socialogy

There's no such word as "socialogy" in the first line of "what penalties to impose." Stars4change (talk) 03:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Merge in

I propose that Organi-cultural deviance be merged into Corporate crime, on the grounds that the former is barely notable by itself, and both pages would benefit from the context of being together. There was a stale proposal to merge the former to White-collar crime, but this seems to be a better destination. For starters, "Organi" in this context is short for "Organization". The incoming page discusses the rationale for some forms of corporate crime. Klbrain (talk) 12:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Given no objections in almost 2 years,  Done Klbrain (talk) 15:38, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corporate crime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150307043033/http://www.bunker8.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/misc/crimgov.htm to http://www.bunker8.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/misc/crimgov.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Corporate Fraud?

"Corporate Fraud" redirects here. That is equivalent?

If it is the same, we would like to mention this term (with bold) in the lead. If not, please somebody define that too. :) Madacs (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Legal Research

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 17 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): User78632 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Diz228, IwearHat$, Ruth833.

— Assignment last updated by User78632 (talk) 15:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

"Undue weight"

@Klbrain and Gnominist: Does this section of this article give "undue weight" to the concept of "organi-cultural deviance?" Jarble (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Yes, somewhat; but at least it's referenced, and being at the bottom of the article doesn't seem intrusive to the more important content earlier. Klbrain (talk) 19:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)