Talk:Corporate nationalism
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge with Corporatism
editThe subject of this article is a subset of corporatism, and it should be incorporated into that article, with reference to the article on Facism. – SJL 05:08, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- No It shouldn't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SpiritualRevolution (talk • contribs) 18:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- No. The article "Corporate nationalism" is POV filled, it completely misrepresents corporatism as a form of capitalism. Corporatism IS NOT REFERRING TO BUSINESS CORPORATIONS LIKE SO MANY PEOPLE THINK. Corporatism refers to the creation of a corporation which fuses managers and labour unions together into one unit which negotiates wages, work conditions, etc. Corporatism is currently advocated in Sweden by social democrats. More famously it has been seen as the corrupt version in Fascist Italy which favoured managers. But corporatism existed prior to fascism and as mentioned earlier, has been advocated by economically left-wing politicians.--R-41 (talk) 04:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
No: it should not: Corpratism has become completely corrupted. The current New World Order is Incorpritism which is Freedom for the connected incorpitist and government enslavement for the masses. Incorpratism is not (in), corpratism. December 20,2008 Gary Taylor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.121.225.196 (talk) 15:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Not a single reference for the entire article, POV filled, and possible original research
editThis article should be deleted if no one can back up the material here. It is very biased, (i.e. attempts to link corporatism as being capitalism which is not accurate, see post in the section above for more detail). It has multiple dubious claims which could be original research or from a very biased source. I for one am a social democrat, but I recognize that this article has no understanding of what corporatism is by claiming that it is related to capitalism and business corporations.--R-41 (talk) 04:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree with the suggestion to delete this. The claims are largely without intellectual foundation and completely misrepresent what social scientists mean when they talk about corporatism. Corporatism is an theory of interest-group representation, with substantial involvement of the state in shaping societal interests. This article should go. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsamuels (talk • contribs) 04:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposal to delete article
editThis article has no reliable references. It misrepresents corporatism as being an ideology of entrenchment of capitalist business corporations. Corporatism is an ideology that predates the modern business corporation that involves the political integration of interest groups based on their functions into a representative body to negotiate laws or regulations to benefit the collective will of each group (these groups can include unions, guilds, religious institutions, military associations, and businesses as well). So now that corporatism has been clarified as a pre-capitalist system, I suggest that this article be deleted due to its total misrepresentation of corporatism.--R-41 (talk) 00:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Corporate nationalism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081230203401/http://www.falange1.com/faq1.htm to http://www.falange1.com/faq1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)