Talk:Corrinne Tarver

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Evrik in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Evrik (talk00:49, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Created by Hameltion (talk). Self-nominated at 23:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Corrinne Tarver; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply


Tarver:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Not sure if newness is counted in days or hours, but if it's over the limit it's only barely over, so that's fine. All Earwig's hits >1% are quotes, titles, or obvious orderings of words. See below regarding hook.


Hamilton:

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  

QPQ:   - The review at Asman Boedisantoso Ranakusuma does not seem to pass WP:DYKCRIT #5c. Could you please substitute another QPQ?
Overall:   Two issues but both fixed pretty easily. All Earwig's hits are simple phrases, although ideally it would be better to rephrase "was in and out of her life" and "Hamilton was born to teenage parents". See below regarding hook.


Ping to Hameltion. Regarding the hook, it's what I'd think of as "minimally interesting", as in it passes the letter of DYKCRIT #3a at its lower limit. But I think the same fact could be presented in a more engaging way. What about:

-- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 19:51, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Tamzin. Made edit. Could you clarify what's wrong with that QPQ? Of course I can provide another if needed. And ALT1 is a little long for my liking - and should include the word "gymnastics" - but definitely more interesting. So could do:
Both very close to 200. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 20:17, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Hameltion: Oh, I'm so sorry, I misread the indentation there! Somehow I thought that the bit before "Very close" was by Narutolovehinata.   Self-trout. QPQ is good to go.   Approved for 1a or 1b, at promoter's discretion. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 20:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Tamzin: No worries! Thanks for much improving this hook. (Also, changing hook's "Corrinne Tarver" → "Corrinne Wright" as she was known.) Hameltion (talk | contribs) 20:27, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply