Talk:Corteo

This article looks like it was entirely cribbed from CdS's publicity material. Needs rewriting for NPOV and brevity. Lee M 20:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Corteo1.jpg

Image:Corteo1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Meaning of "Corteo"

The word "corteo" in Italian does not necessarirly mean "funeral procession" - that would be "corteo funebre". It just means "procession", a large group of people walking in the streets aiming to get to some place. The reference at the end of the paragraph supports this. I'm changing it. Cebriancobos (talk) 05:47, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Location of San José, Costa Rica

San José, Costa Rica is not located in North America, but in Central America, as indicated in de 2015 schedule. Another colorbox for Central America (CA) should be added in the tour section. Thanks, Francisco C. San José, Costa Rica — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.91.139.230 (talk) 19:57, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corteo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070422210325/http://www.mitchedi.com/ to http://www.mitchedi.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 17:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for looking at this, Moneytrees! I was not prepared to do it – hundreds of revisions to go through, endless additions of inappropriate promotional content presumably copied verbatim from the publicity materials of the company. But I wonder, are you sure that you got it all? The first copyvio I managed to identify was on 27 September 2005; that was removed, then re-added on 8 January 2006. All the content added by an IP from 10 August 2006 shows every sign of being copied from somewhere or other. Shouldn't the revision deletion extend back to those edits? Are we quite sure that none of that content remains? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Justlettersandnumbers, I didn't even notice that this page had another 500 or so revisions (wtf???), I see three different copyright violations being inserted and removed. Using the earwig comparison tactic, where you insert the revision url into the url comparison box when scanning the article, they appear to be gone. What a damn mess. Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 18:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC)