Talk:Cortinarius mucosus

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

edibility

edit

The edibility information may have to be considered at least misleading. As I understand, it is based on a statement on the Cortinarius genus in general. A book of mine contains information that may suggest that C. mucosus is an exception here in being a "relatively easy to recognise Cortinarius" (translated) - and it is stated to be edible.[1]--Natr (talk) 12:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi you are welcome to add a sentence or two based on the book and reference it. It is not uncommon for different guides to give varying opinions. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Hans E. Laux: Essbare Pilze und ihre giftigen Doppelgänger - Pilze sammeln, aber richtig. Kosmos Verlags-GmbH, Stuttgart 2005
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cortinarius mucosus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:20, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply