Talk:Cosmatesque

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

How does Cosmatesque differ from, say, Opus sectile, Opus tessellatum, Opus vermiculatum, or mosaics?. This article doesn't actually define the term. Zidel333 (talk) 06:56, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cosmati vs Cosmatesque

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Cosmatesque and Cosmati seems to imply that a Cosmati pavement is one made by the Cosmati family and a Cosmatesque pavement is one in that style but not necessarily by the Cosmati family.

However, [1] and [2] describe the pavement in Westminster Abbey (which was not made by the Cosmati family) as a Cosmati pavement.

Should this ambiguity of the term "Cosmati" be mentioned?

cmɢʟee☺τaʟκ 17:31, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have made changes, but a) Do we actually know that that the men from Rome who worked at Westminster weren't from the Cosmati team? The links don't say so; and b) if we do, it's more inaccuracy than ambiguity to my mind. But I think Cosmati is used loosely. Johnbod (talk) 01:07, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Description and early history

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the 3rd paragraph, the last sentence:

Laurentius acquired his craft from Greek masters and for a time followed their method of work, but early in his career, freeing himself from Byzantine traditions and influences, he worked along original lines and evolved a new style of decorative mosaic, vigorous in colour and design, which he invariably employed in conjunction with plain or sculpted marble surfaces, making it a decorative accessary to some architectural feature.

is ponderous and difficult. I didn't change it for fear of making an error in fact or omission, but I would submit this:

Laurentius acquired his craft from Greek masters and for a time followed their method of work, but early in his career developed an original style. Freeing himself from Byzantine traditions and influences, Laurentius's style evolved into a decorative mosaic, vigorous in colour and design, which he employed in conjunction with plain or sculpted marble surfaces. Thus, he applied decorative features to architectural necessities.

for your consideration. John Sinclair (talk) 06:34, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic