Talk:Cosmic Call
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
"The messages are designed with noise resistant format and characters, which make it resistant to alteration by noise." - Redundant phrasing is redundant? Or am I missing some small distinction between the meaning of the former and latter parts of the sentence? Metasyntactic D (talk) 02:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Looks like it was translated from Russian. Kortoso (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cosmic Call. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090515102750/http://cs.astronomy.com:80/asycs/forums/p/17428/295175.aspx to http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/forums/p/17428/295175.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Confirm target stars CC1, CC2; discrepancy
editGreetings, I've noticed page four in this document (https://www.plover.com/misc/Dumas-Dutil/messages.pdf -- linked to in this article as the "Dutil-Dumas Message") lists several different star targets for the 1999 and 2003 cosmic calls (Cosmic Call 1 and Cosmic Call 2, respectively) than this source (http://www.cplire.ru/rus/ra&sr/VAK-2004.html) that's cited in this article. I say this taking into consideration the difference between the HD and Hip cataloging. May be worth looking at for someone knowledgeable in this topic. Joeparsec (talk) 04:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC)