Talk:Coumachlor

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coumachlor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120119193658/http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/ProductDetail.do?D7=0&N5=SEARCH_CONCAT_PNO to http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/ProductDetail.do?D7=0&N5=SEARCH_CONCAT_PNO

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coumachlor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426041946/http://www.clearsynth.com/docs/MSD-CS-T-05321.pdf to http://www.clearsynth.com/docs/MSD-CS-T-05321.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Removing insanely incorrect statement

I am removing a sentence from this stub article "Although the compound is non-hazardous but toxicological properties have not been researched yet.[3]" as this is not only bad grammar but blatantly daft. This chemical was used as a rodenticide, its toxicity to mammals is listed in the original quoted reference as 'high' (as you'd expect for a chemical designed to kill mammals), and it has a whole string of unpleasant consequences for anyone who consumes it. It's quite scary and irresponsible that Wikipedia is going round describing things like this as 'non-hazardous'. It's quite common for chemical data-sheets to have a lot of not-yet-investigated properties, but that's no excuse for assuming lack of hazard. I have no reason to believe that this compound is any more harmful than other rat poisons, but it's definitely not non-hazardous. 149.155.219.44 (talk) 09:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)