Talk:Council for the Registration of Schools Teaching Dyslexic Pupils
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 April 2012. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability and importance
editThis article doesn't appear to have any claim to basic notability. The citations are not relevant to the text and the Gabbittas reference is an advertorial directory. Also, the importance of this organisation is in question - I can't seem to find any third party mention of it. If importance/notability can be established to a minimum perhaps a merge with [[1]] would be better.
Totolatin (talk) 10:04, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your edit-warring. The sources provided are perfectly valid; the Gabbitas book is published by Kogan Page (a major educational publishing house), and whilst a directory of sorts, gives extensive coverage of the subject. Third party mentions abound in Google News and Books searches (tip: add "dyslexic" or "dyslexia" as an additional search term). Yunshui 雲水 10:40, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- uncivil remark about edit warring. I'm simply adopting your own BOLD strategy for removing content. The gabbitas entry is an useless piece of advertorial directory listing which shames your article. And the others are made up. Google searches are not an indication of notability. But then you yourself said that earlier ... LOL! You're good at trolling, but not good at receiving it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Totolatin (talk • contribs) 10:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material LOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Totolatin (talk • contribs) 10:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)