Wikipedia

Talk:Counter-recruitment

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Convention on the Rights of the Child violation

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article mentions, under the U.S. section, one specific anti-recruitment stance: that JROTC and other similar paramilitary youth programs may be in violation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. However, the U.S. has not signed this convention. That would therefore make said point inaccurate and also rather silly, no? Forgive me if that doesn't warrant removal, just pointing it out. 24.99.120.119 (talk) 03:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Imbalance in article

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This page now at least has some history to counter-recruitment, since I added the information from Cortright. But it's still badly biased towards U.S. (anti-)military counter-recruitment, leaving off not only actions against corporations that have been part of the global justice movement, but any and all actions in countries other than the U.S. Kalkin 21:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi all. I've tried to add some items in the criticism section. Hope we can balance things out. The decoy 01:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Hello again all. I've made some edits to the Canada section, as someone had posted information about York University without any way of verifying it. I did some research and was able to track down one link. The article has been re-written to reflect the verifiable information in the article. It was also badly written so I edited it. Dec 27 2008. The decoy —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC).Reply

Lack of criticism to counter-recruitment

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

This page is severely biased as do not show any criticism to counter-recruitment --81.202.158.49 09:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

It is true, this page does not show any criticism to counter recruitment, it is also true it doesn't say anywhere that counter-recruitment is a good thing, or implies this is in anyway.

The article is not biased, it is NPOV. - Ryan 1711 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.6.16 (talk) 15:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

This article is completely biased. Referring to the mission in Afghanistan as "occupation" is clearly a POV position. The decoy 00:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)decoyReply

The article is also rife with weasel words. Removed some "weasel words" from the Canadian section. The decoy (talk) 23:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Opposition to militarism and fascism is always positive. The military action - state sanctioned murder - for decades has wrought the most deaths and suffering, for personal gain of a select few. The amount of funding and propaganda for pro militarism vastly outweighs any and all counter recruitment.

-G — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.50.114.34 (talk) 01:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Reference number 7 is broken: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13369468/ I can't find a mirror of this article on Google. Anyone know of a similar study? John Holden (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:You-can't-be-all-that-you-can-be-if-you're-dead.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:You-can't-be-all-that-you-can-be-if-you're-dead.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

These articles talk about the same "Recruitment in the Military" with Pro's & Con's which can be put into the same article. Mr Taz (talk) 19:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Counter-recruitment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:09, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Counter-recruitment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Counter-recruitment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Counter-recruitment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Counter-recruitment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Counter-recruitment&oldid=1212719776"