Talk:Court of High Commission

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Court of High Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050816130723/http://www.lawsch.uga.edu/~glorious/chron.html to http://www.lawsch.uga.edu/~glorious/chron.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Court of High Commission after the Triennial Act

The article mentions that the Court of High Commission lasted from King Henry VIII's reign to 1689, but the article ends with the dissolution by the Triennial Act in 1641. Does this mean that the Triennial Act was eventually repealed and the Court of High Commission was reinstated until 1689? What caused the final end? A3ec6fYprq (talk) 03:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

I added some information on that, thanks for the suggestion! Notarealperson2 (talk) 20:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Add Dates in First Sentence

A suggestion: for context, you could add the years of King Henry’s reign in the first sentence. Or you could include who was king during 1689. CmisterHistorian (talk) 13:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

I added some, do you think that helped it? Notarealperson2 (talk) 19:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Dissolving of the high court.

I think your article could be substantiated if information about why the High Court was dissolved in 1641. Mia1199 (talk) 17:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion! I unfortunately could not find information on why the triennial act affected the court within the timeframe of the assignments completion date. The original addition for that section was left without a citation to begin with and I was tempted to eliminate it completely. Notarealperson2 (talk) 20:05, 16 April 2023 (UTC)