Talk:Court of King's Bench (England)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Aiken drum in topic GA Review
Court of King's Bench (England) has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 7, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that between 1560 and 1640, the business of the English Court of King's Bench rose tenfold? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Court of King's Bench (England)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Aiken ♫ 15:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
This is very good indeed, and I think you should consider trying for a FA. It meets all criteria pretty easily. Just some very minor points:
- Reform
- I don't understand what "Fairfax J" is.
- Mr Justice Fairfax, or Judge Fairfax - it's legally abbreviated as Fairfax J, or LJ, or MR, depending on the title. Ironholds (talk) 19:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Struggle with the Common Pleas
- "then the very attorneys of the Common Pleas boggled at them and carried all their finable business to the King's Bench" needs attributing.
- Fixed. Ironholds (talk) 19:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- General
- Keep the capitalisation of "king" consistent. Sometimes it's capitalised, sometimes not. Choose one and stick with it.
- Fixed, I think. Ironholds (talk) 19:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
As soon as these have been addressed I'll pass the article. Aiken ♫ 18:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Great, passing. Aiken ♫ 19:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)