Talk:Covasna
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Covasna be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Romania may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
"Hungarian pronunciation"
editI Think the Hungarian pronunciation of the name is [kovɒsnɒ], not [kovɒʃnɒ]. Please, whoever added it, cite some sources to prove that I'm wrong or I'll change it to [s] soon. Christomir (talk) 15:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- User:Rokarudi added many Hungarian pronunciations, you should contact him, if he did`t added it he probably has knowledge about this matter.Adrian (talk) 15:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Christomir, I already corrected it, thank you for your remark. Rokarudi
File:Kovaszna1.JPG Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Kovaszna1.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kovaszna1.JPG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:12, 11 April 2012 (UTC) |
Irrelevant paragraph "2013 Discrimination against Romanian students"
editThis article should discuss the city and it's not a place to put local news (especially whatever minor conflict which happened in a school) that will be irrelevant the next week. See Wikipedia is not a newspaper.
It's alse undue weight because it's not an event important enough to warrant a whole section. bogdan (talk) 20:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- Agree that this data is not relevant to this article, but not irrelevant at all. Maybe this data could be better placed on the Anti-Romanian discrimination article? Adrian (talk) 20:18, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- Well, it's definitely more relevant there than here. In the unlikely event that the story develops rather than dying out, it might even warrant an article. bogdan (talk) 20:35, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, I will move this data there now. Adrian (talk) 10:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Covasna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130113024306/http://www.primariacovasna.ro/hu/ to http://www.primariacovasna.ro/hu
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.info-covasna.ro/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)