Talk:Covenant (religion)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merge with Covenant (biblical)

edit

Should we merge this with Covenant (biblical). Although not entirely unique to the Judaeo-Christian tradition, the idea of covenant is developed much further in that tradition than in any other, so most of what we are going to be able to say about this topic will be about the biblical notion. So that suggests there is no point having one (inevitably brief) article for the topic in general, and one much longer for the biblical topic -- we could just move the non-biblical information to a section of the biblical article, with a heading like "In other traditions"? --SJK (talk) 00:25, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merge with Covenant (biblical)

edit

In my (years ago) study on the subject, there was a lot of information on the institution of "Covenant" throughout the Ancient Near East and am frankly surprised there's not more here. I would prefer "Covenant (religion)" be expanded rather than merged. As it stands, though, it could certainly be a section within "Covenant (biblical)." DVMcFarland (talk) 20:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)DVMcFReply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Covenant (religion). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply