Talk:Coventry Transport Museum
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Coventry Transport Museum article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special Category for British Motorcycles
editAs part of the Motorcycling WikProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes. To make things easier to sort out there is a special Category:British motorcycles Please add to any British motorcycle pages you find or create. It will also help to keep things organised if you use the Template:Infobox Motorcycle or add it where it is missing. I've linked the Category to the Commons Motorcycles of Britain so you could help with matching pics to articles or adding the missing images to the Commons. Thanks Tony (talk) 21:01, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Articles should be categorized as per Wikipedia:Categorization. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Eponymous categories
edit
Moved from User talk:DeFactoPlease don't remove categories from pages just because there is an eponymous category, like you did with Coventry Transport Museum. Wikipedia:EPON makes it clear that you should follow the norm of the specific category.Mason (talk) 02:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- What is the norm of this specific category then? -- DeFacto (talk). 07:48, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know. But my point is that you can't just blank gut them without looking at the categories. I restored them because many of them shouldn't have been applied to the epon category. Mason (talk) 20:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)