Talk:Covered California

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Wompa1 in topic Link to video is broken!

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): C2magana. Peer reviewers: Jnaoum14, C2magana, Dit011.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Covered California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Criticism

edit

I have two issues with this page: 1) It's outdated. For the staff and budget section, it's written that it is projected that Covered California will have a deficit at the end of 2015. That was two years ago and the sources need to be updated for this year (2017). 2) The Impacts section needs to have both pros and cons to not seem biased. You could even make a 'criticisms' subsection of that to reference what people don't like about it. Jnaoum14 (talk) 16:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Jnaoum14Jnaoum14 (talk) 16:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Some Critiques of this page 1. In the Participating Insurance Providers Section, the source should be updated. the section claims that the list is of insurance providers participating in the exchange as of 2017, but the source is for fiscal year 2015. 2. Impact section should be expanded. Congresswoman Pelosi is one of three sources in the section, given her role in passing the ACA as Speaker of the House, she is not a neutral source for evaluation of Covered California's impact. 3. Staff and Budget Section should be updated to represent the impact for FY 2017 or 2016 if 2017 data is unavailable. C2magana (talk) 05:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Jnaoum14 and C2magana: Good calls! Can either or both of you edit the page to bring it to the quality standard that you want? Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

I tried to play the first video in this article, and it has a broken link. Wompa1 (talk) 14:52, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply