| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zoologist?
editNot sure if he can be categorised as a zoologist. Does he have any academic qualifications? -- Alan Liefting-talk- 23:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Agree - he's a lay person with practical experience. Not the same thing Tangoette (talk) 23:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Busch has no formal qualifications. His backgound is that of entrepreneur with a number of failed businesses over the years prior to going to the United States.--MadManTed (talk) 00:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Pure opinion & borderline defamation
editJust about everything on this page is pure opinion and speculation, without any facts to support it. Where are the great reviews to support the claim the third season aired to great reviews? Who calls him a wife beater? Karen Greybrook wasn't his wife she was his partner. Has the person that says it's fine to hit a cub got any evidence to support that. Where are the references?
On top of that the grammar is poor. The page needs a complete rewrite and I recommend the content be scrapped until someone who knows what they're talking about can contribute. The wife beater comments are borderline defamatory. He admits to assaulting his ex partner - not the same thing. Shoddy treatment of his partner but not enough to label him a wife beater. Tangoette (talk) 23:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
There should be something about that incident on the page - and yes, he did assault his partner, but he had just walked in on her naked in bed with their 2 best friends... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.118.23 (talk) 18:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC) So that means he can physically attack a female and leave here with serious injuries wsithout further ado? I don't think your comment is valid or well reasoned. --MadManTed (talk) 00:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Busch had a New Zealand conviction in 1991 for male assaults female. The events leading up to his assault on the late Karen Greybrooke [1] are well documented. --MadManTed (talk) 00:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC)--MadManTed (talk) 00:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by MadManTed (talk • contribs) 07:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Court case
editIs there any information about the court case yet? The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 13:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC) Which court case? --Tangihua (talk) 08:09, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Neutrality
editI have requested a review for neutrality here because I feel that the article appears to be mostly skewed towards negative legal issues about him. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 12:04, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Finding positive information on this person is difficult as most of the information involves a multitude of controversial issues. All the information there is factual and written without bias. Zoohistorian (talk) 11:16, 19 May 2015 (UTC)