Talk:Craig Conroy

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleCraig Conroy has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 13, 2011Good article nomineeListed



GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Craig Conroy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrias talk 16:41, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

General comments
  • Looks pretty good overall: the Career statistics is completely unreferenced, please insert a reference into that section for the statistics.
  • The External link typically supports this, but I have added a general citation under the references section that supports the stats.
  • Referencing in general looks pretty good, but when using news references, for example New York Times, please add location and publisher details.
  • That would actually be redundant, given the publisher is the New York Times, and the location is New York. That would also be out of line with how newspaper citations are generally used on most other GA and FA articles.
  • I'm not going to lie. I don't see the point, especially as such entries would bring the formating out of alignment with the overwhelming majority of GAs and FAs. The only time I'd use both the work and publisher parameter is when someone has republished someone else's work. Additionally, I don't see the relevance of knowing that Lee Enterprises publishes the St. Louis Post dispatch, as one example. Resolute 19:17, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • You make a fair point: I thought that at some stage, someone had told me that these were required, but having trawled through some policy pages, and a few of my own GANs etc, I can't see anything about it. I still think locations would be useful for those ambiguous titles (The Daily Gazette, Globe and Mail), but otherwise I can live with the remainder of the information being omitted: sorry for seeming picky about this, as I said, I'd come to believe it was a necessity. Harrias talk 20:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Early life
  • I'm not sure whether RPI should be written out in full or not. By the letter of the MOS, it probably should, but given that RPI seems to be a common abbreviation for it, and you have provided a link, I can accept it being abbreviated.
  • "With the goals, Conroy reached 100 career points, making he and Mike the only father-son pair in Clarkson's history to both reach that milestone." – Sentence sounds clumsy, particularly the "making he and Mike" bit. Perhaps try rewording for clarity and to avoid referring to his father by purely his first name. I'm afraid I can't think of anything myself right now though!
  • Yeah, I've reworded this statement a few times while working on the article. I've tried again, let me know if its any better.
Professional career
  • "established himself as a regular NHLer.." – not sure that NHLer is encyclopedic language: "NHL player" should probably be used instead.
  • Reworded
  • "He reached two milestones that season, scoring his 300th career point against the Vancouver Canucks on November 29, 2003 and played his 600th game against the Detroit Red Wings on March 16, 2004." – you switch tenses twice during this sentence: "He reached ..., scoring ... and played ..." Stick to the past tense throughout.
  • Oops, fixed
  • "He returned for another season the Flames re-signed him to a one-year, two-way contract for the league minimum of $500,000." – There's a word missing, or something, in this sentence: it doesn't make much sense at the moment.
  • Sure did, fixed.
  • "..Conroy would only play nine more games.." change to "Conroy only played nine more games".
  • Fixed.

I will place the article on hold while you deal with my comments: overall a nice article though. Harrias talk 17:01, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, and thanks for the review! I believe I have addressed your concerns. Cheers, Resolute 15:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Though I still have a minor outstanding concern regarding the referencing (see my reply above), I'm now happy to pass the article as a Good Article. I'm also not sure about the capitalization of "National Team" in the lead, but that is certainly nothing to with-hold a pass for! Harrias talk 20:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Craig Conroy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Great guy - was in a few classes in college with him, and he always had that good guy demeanor. I miss watching him play. Bgarlock (talk) 23:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Craig Conroy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Craig Conroy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply