Talk:Craig Oliver (British journalist)
It is requested that an image or photograph of Craig Oliver (British journalist) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Paya Ltd
editThe article currently claims that, along with Gosling, he's co-director of Paya Ltd. I've Goodled this, but without success. The reference provided (i.e., the Companies House website) seems to need someone with access. I'm assuming it was added in good faith by someone with a user account, but can someone either verify it or find a better one? TheRetroGuy (talk) 16:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- There's certainly a company with that name and registration number, but I can find no reference to Oliver or Gosling (other than on Wikipedia). Googling for "Craig Stewart Oliver" confirms the BBC World directorship, and shows references to other companies, but not Paya. TheRetroGuy (talk) 18:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Information remved for now. If anyone wants to re-add it then please find a reliable reference. TheRetroGuy (talk) 20:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Craig Oliver (British journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081229053844/http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk:80/ to http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 18 December 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved'. Consensus against moving. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 04:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Craig Oliver (British journalist) → Craig Oliver – This guy is far more than a journalist, as the opening sentence displays, and he displays far greater notability than his namesake.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 22:45, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support: Definitely a primary topic. This is Paul (talk) 22:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: Further to my earlier post. While both have received significant national honours in their respective countries, my feeling is that the the British Craig Oliver meets the criteria as a primary topic because of his role in government, which he held for several years. If others disagree and the discussion closes as a no move it will be worth considering a move to another title since the title journalist does not properly represent the subject. This is Paul (talk) 01:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose: Craig Oliver is a disambiguation page, because there is a Canadian journalist at Craig Oliver (Canadian journalist). Both articles receive significant average daily pageviews (Canadian = 38/day for the past year, British = 47/day for the past year, including tons of views in the last few days). Both have received significant national-level honours. It may be reasonable to change the title of this article to reflect the wider range of experience, in part because he's recently made a lot of media appearances as a pundit of sorts, but it is difficult to justify splitting up the disambiguation page for what is essentially recentism. Risker (talk) 00:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose NOPRIMARY, no exclusive long-term significance to either In ictu oculi (talk) 00:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Risker and In ictu oculi. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 08:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose as no primary topic by usage. The British Oliver may have an edge in long-term significance for his political role, but I can't see that it's enough to make him the primary topic. Ralbegen (talk) 09:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. The British journalist only gets 54% of the views, and there are days when the Canadian journalist gets more; see the pageview analysis. No WP:PTOPIC. Narky Blert (talk) 12:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.