Talk:Crane v. Commissioner

U.S. Supreme Court cases High‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hey, I think whoever wrote this article got their facts mixed up somewhat. I just got finished reading this case for my Fed Income Tax course, and the Ct specifically says that the amt of the mortgage was not greater than the value of the property. Maybe I'm just reading the article wrong, but you seem to say that the income was the amt of the mortgage that exceeded the value of the prop. In other words, she received income in the amt that she discharged a debt (or liability) for which she had no corresponding asset to balance out that liability. But that's not what the case says

129.137.84.113 (talk) 20:48, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Mr. MethosReply

Add topic