This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I rehatnoted this primarily because there's still no independent validation of the stunning usage claims in the article. A company blog isn't a reliable source. Also, 8 of the 21 sources are primary company sources, and 8 are from TechCrunch. That leaves only 5 independent and non-TechCrunch sources. There's more info out there - it just needs to be added.Timtempleton (talk) 18:54, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply