This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Crassigyrinus is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Article read: "Crassigyrinus grew up to 1.5 meters in length, coupled with punitive limbs and unusually large jaws."
I changed "punitive" to "small", with the edit summary " ""punitive" is apparently just wrong here".
User:71.246.96.183 changed this back to "punitive", with the edit summary "have you seen the forelimbs?"
I have seen the illustrations of C. in this article, and yes, the forelimbs appear to have been darned small.
However, definitions of "punitive" include: "serving for, concerned with, or inflicting punishment", "Inflicting or aiming to inflict punishment; punishing", "inflicting, involving, or aiming at punishment", "intended as a punishment", "used to describe costs which are so high they are difficult to pay, and which are often used to punish someone or limit their activities", "inflicting, involving, or aiming at punishment" (from -- http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/punitive -- http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=64215&dict=CALD -- http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/punitive )
As far as I can tell, all definitions are in this "semantic range", and there is no definition which refers to "size".
It looks to me, as I originally said, that "punitive" is apparently just wrong here, and that we want to use some other word.
Comments?
-- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 11:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)Reply