Talk:Crawford Long

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 201.208.98.66 in topic Peer Review for Ssimko1
Former good article nomineeCrawford Long was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 4, 2017Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 30, 2012, March 30, 2016, and March 30, 2019.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ssimko1, Hhowar12. Peer reviewers: Amohan12, Ccoope52, Mpatel58.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Life and Work?

edit

Hey, the information in the article is very well presented. The language is neutral and clear, and moves along at a good pace. I'm curious, though, if splitting up the initial part of his life and then his career would help the organization of the article. This is my only real organizational critique of the article. Beyond that, I think that the "Legacy" section contains a lot of interesting information, but that it needs to be organized into a more paragraph form. Try to find some way to connect them, or if not, consider creating a different section for it. Good work! Ccoope52 (talk) 15:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Ssimko1 (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Pharmacist?

edit

Is it accurate to present him as a pharmacist? EtherDoc (talk) 16:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Public demonstration?

edit

Requests to cite early public demonstrations of ether anesthesia by Long have not been heeded. I will remove references to "public demonstrations" before 1846 until an actual reference is found. EtherDoc (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review for Ssimko1

edit

Hey, I really liked your contribution and enjoyed reading what you had to write about Crawford Long. To further improve your addition, I would recommend reformatting it so that the legacy section flows better--maybe relate the information about Long's legacy and posthumous honors in a way so that it connects with the previous sentences instead of having disjoint facts. When you write: "In 1879, the National Eclectic Medical Association declared that Long was the official discoverer of anesthesia.[17] “Doctors Day” is celebrated on March 30 every year to commemorate Long’s contributions. The University of Pennsylvania memorialized Crawford W. Long in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, April 1912, with a bulletin and bronze medallion.[18]" It just seems like a list of facts as opposed to an article. Alternatively, you could potentially start a new section detailing the honors awarded to Dr. Long as a section separate from his legacy.Overall, I feel your article was really well-researched and cited, great work! Mpatel58 (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate the feedback!Ssimko1 (talk) 20:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

En la revisión de referencias solo aparece la amputación de 2 dedos del pie de un niño hijo de un esclavo como secuela de quemadura, un dedo bajo anestesia por eter Long por intento convencional de amputación supo que no tenía poderes sobrenaturales, en 1842 hubo 3 testigos de la primera anestesia en la historia médica 30 de marz 201.208.98.66 (talk) 03:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Crawford Long/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 19:51, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

I propose to review this article. Before I read it in detail, there are a couple of points that need to be dealt with. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:51, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • The lead is too short. It should be a summary of the main body of text and should not need to include any references because everything mentioned should be in the main part of the article, and that is where the citations should be.
  • There are some sentences and short paragraphs that have no citations.
No attempt has been made to act on my comments and I am failing this nomination. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crawford Long. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:51, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Slaves

edit

Need to add more information on this, here is a good source with more info on it: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2563360/ Llightex (talk) 19:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Amputations on African slaves

edit

"...best known for his first use of inhaled sulfuric ether as an anesthetic, discovered by performing surgeries on disabled African American slaves that included the amputations of their fingers and toes."

So what about those horrors? Did Long perpetrate them? Certainly the text strongly suggests it. No further details given. Maybe just bad writing and someone else did it. 2A02:AA1:160B:CE1E:1432:4C38:E36E:1055 (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply