Talk:Creative Evolution (book)

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Philosophy: Literature / Science / Modern Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Philosophy of science
	Modern philosophy

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Influence on Shaw?

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

George Bernard Shaw expressed belief in evolution being driven by a "Life Force". Is this the same system as Bergson's, with "life force" being a translation of "elan vital"? If so, since Shaw is more well-known than Bergson, it should have gotten a mention. 50.180.19.238 (talk) 16:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Idiotic Misinterpretation

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Pretty fed up with this site right now so not going to correct this. This work is not about biological evolution. 108.183.102.223 (talk) 11:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic