This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Creative MuVo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on September 23, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixing Up
editWe need to fix this page up though, regardless of the 'keep,' on the account of the bottom page... i dunno how to sort that stuff out though... Reeves 20:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed, what do you think needs doing soonest? Pbeesley1989 00:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- I think the thing with all the rated storage capacities for the MuVo should placed on a seperate page and be compiled into something that look's more like a graph than a list.
- Reeves 05:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, I made a new page, the list has been redirected to that page, I'm not sure if that was the right thing to do though...... give me suggestions, I got lazy in the middle, I'll get up to fixing up the list sometime in the future... or sum1 else can do it.
- Reeves 03:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Still Alive?
editIs the MuVo series still alive? I thought all new flash players released by Creative was now called Zen, thus killing the product name MuVo.
- I don't know, I don't follow up on this article anymore, it's practically dead. By the way, sign your name User:Ran4
- Sans Nom Reeves 03:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Not really... The MuVo series is basically a group of physically similar players (except the MuVo², MuVo Slim and MuVo Vidz, of course), and the latest models, the V100 and the S200 was released last year, while the N200 was rebranded as the ZEN Nano (Plus). --Jw21/PenaltyKillah(discuss•edits) 06:23, 28 September 2007 (UTC)