This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
If this draft were moved to article space, would it probably survive a listing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion? Issues that do not affect the likelihood of success at AfD (e.g., halo effects like formatting) should not be considered when making this fundamental calculation, although I'm sure the author would appreciate any advice or help improving it. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:54, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
I think this should make it. As a cardiologist with an interest in inherited conditions who regularly uses and directs patients to CredibleMeds, this is a really valuable resource. This is reflected in the adequate secondary coverage. The site has been mentioned obliquely in several of the QT articles e.g. Long QT syndrome, Andersen-Tawil syndrome and deserves an article. As it stands it is only a stub but I think it should stay. I've edited it slightly for style. PeaBrainC (talk) 18:45, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
