Talk:Creighton Lovelace
This article was nominated for deletion on December 16, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis article should be kept due to the 34,800 hits Creighton Lovelace has on Google. Not to mention the coverage that occurred in the National Media and on MSNBC.
Who decides what is important enough to be included anyway?
I would much rather read an article like this than one about some actor.
age
editare we sure this guy was born in 1981? He looks older than 25...
You can check my birth cert in the Clerk's Office in Rutherford County, I was born Dec. 15, 1981 at 11:56PM weighing 2 lbs, and 2 ozs. - creigl —Preceding unsigned comment added by Creigl (talk • contribs) 05:22, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:KoranSign.jpg
editFile:KoranSign.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Creighton Lovelace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20060505185759/http://www.abpnews.com/371.article to http://www.abpnews.com/371.article
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.thedigitalcourier.com/articles/2005/05/24/news/news01.txt - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050527024717/http://www.muslimnews.co.uk/news/news.php?article=9225 to http://www.muslimnews.co.uk/news/news.php?article=9225
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927230107/http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/51213 to http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/51213
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Creighton Lovelace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050923184558/http://homepage.mac.com/onegoodmove/movies/koran.mov to http://homepage.mac.com/onegoodmove/movies/koran.mov
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050601002845/http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=20858 to http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=20858
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930192346/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_26-5-2005_pg7_50 to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_26-5-2005_pg7_50
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)