Talk:Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Requested move 4 March 2020
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved as proposed. BD2412 T 03:48, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Dragon 2 In-Flight Abort Test → Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test – Per Wikipedia's guidelines on consistent article titles, harmonising with Crew Dragon Demo-1 and Crew Dragon Demo-2. Also noting that this was a test of a Crew Dragon capsule specifically, and not of the broader Dragon 2 design. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 00:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support Per nomination reason. Ultimograph5 (talk) 01:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support seems to be the more common name elsewhere, too. --mfb (talk) 07:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support per others (and nom). --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 13:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
The space shuttle didn't have "Few feasible options" for abort
editWhile the space shuttle did have areas where no abort/bailout was possible, especially before the Challenger disaster, the abort modes did exist and did not have any obvious issues with feasibility. The statement that the space shuttle had "few feasible abort options" should be removed because feasibility is a matter of opinion and the space shuttle had meticulously planned abort modes. Titan(moon)003 (talk) 22:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)