Talk:Criel Mound
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editIf I am not mistaken, the skeleton of a chief was found at this mound. He was an astounding 7 feet 6 inches long, if my memory serves me right.
Correct. I edited the articled to read "very large" skeleton instead of "large" skeleton. Technically I could use the term giant, but that probably would be considered not scholarly by some.--75.175.67.155 (talk) 23:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Criel Mound. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080623005836/http://www.wvculture.org:80/hiStory/mounds.html to http://www.wvculture.org/history/mounds.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Date of Construction
edit@SimpsonDG: You added the construction date for the mound as "probably around 250-150 BC" in your big additions made here. Than you for your additions. Unfortunately, there is no citation that goes to any of these references, so there is no easy way to verify where you got the date. Can you illuminate?
I just visited the site, which is why I am confused by the dates. The 1963 plaque from the state of WV says "about A.D. 1". image of plaque I found online. A more recent exhibit, which I believe was created after your edit, says "the Kanawha Valley Mounds were probably built in the Woodland period, after 500 B.C." (The exhibit is part of the Midland Trail Nation Scenic Byway. A relevant page is here and a another photo of an exhibit is here). Also there is this WV encyclopedia entry: [1]. Do you think your source is more accurate than the information used by the Midland Trail project?
@Doug Weller: I see that you were the last person to edit the article. Curious your thoughts on this. --David Tornheim (talk) 17:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Related question: Does anyone know the standard we are using for dates? B.C. vs. B.C.E.? Woodland period uses B.C.E. --David Tornheim (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- @David Tornheim: see WP:ERA - in any case it should be BC or BCE. It's BC at the moment so any change would have to be made according to the guideline. I'd prefer BCE. Doug Weller talk 17:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Missed the rest. I don't have time to look at this, sorry. Probably won't for a few days. I wouldn't trust such signs, there's a park sigh somewhere that claims Prince Madoc was there. I did take a quick look, surprisingly little. Doug Weller talk 18:50, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Kanawha Valley Mounds
editPlease note that I also created a Kanawha Valley Mounds which I redirected here. Based on the exhibit at the Criel Mound, I'm confident the subject is sufficiently notable, but I don't have the time to write an article that has enough substance. I believe everything we have on the Kanawha Valley Mounds is here in this article, so I just used a redict. However, I would support a full article for Kanawha Valley Mounds if there is material that goes beyond what is in this article that we would want to add. I might create it, but not today. Just a heads up. If anyone else wants to expand my redirect into a regular article, be my guest. --David Tornheim (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
I changed the redirect to the appropriate section of this article. --David Tornheim (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)