Talk:Crimson Lotus

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Does it make sense to link to CL's last.fm page? There's no further relevant information there, and the existence of a last.fm page by itself is rather irrelevant too: every artist once played by anyone using audioscrobbler has their page created on last.fm automatically. I think every link should be justified by a certain amount of new information the reader can derive from it. -Bringa 17:01, 18 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

last.fm

edit

Since CL @ last.fm are 'established' in the sense that they have an official image and albums added (the latter which can only be done by the label, not by users), and listening stats might be interesting for people interested in the band or those wondering which song is representative of the band, I'd rather leave the link in. Another point are the related artists which might help decide whether one would like the band (with a bit of wishful thinking regarding last.fm's algorithms). Although, admittedly, with freely available tracks on the internet, all it takes to check the band out are some clicks and a little download. --Matthias Bauer 17:19, 18 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crimson Lotus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply