Talk:Crinum

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crinum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110627000657/http://planet.botany.uwc.ac.za:80/NISL/Biodiversity/Attachments/Plants%20of%20SA.pdf? to http://planet.botany.uwc.ac.za/NISL/Biodiversity/Attachments/Plants%20of%20SA.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Crinum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://planet.botany.uwc.ac.za/NISL/Biodiversity/Attachments/Plants%20of%20SA.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060205230607/http://crinum.iconx.com/ to http://www.crinum.iconx.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013000710/http://www.crinum.org/ to http://www.crinum.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:45, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Confusion

Usually "Queen Emma Lily" is used to refer to C. x augustum (probably a HYBRID of C. asiaticum and C. zeylanicum (https://www.pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/index.php/CrinumHybridsStriped) and has white and purple flowers and is very scented. "Spider Lily" is usually C. asiaticum. The whole subject is confusing and the current article doesn't help and might be misleading or incorrect.Paulhummerman (talk) 18:50, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

@Paulhummerman: English names need to be referenced just as much as other information, and if not referenced can be removed. So feel free. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:18, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

I am glad I could find "Queen Emma Lily" here, but the redirect to this article doesn't seem to make much sense if it's supposed to be synonymous with Crinum asiaticum and we have an article on that. Why not redirect there? --87.150.13.29 (talk) 08:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Actually, it's supposed to be a cultivar of Crinum augustum, at least according to this source. But this is a synonym of Crinum × amabile according to Plants of the World Online. The confusion over the species seems a reason to leave it here for now. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)