Croft-on-Tees is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The sentence The 1861 Epsom Derby winner Kettledrum was born at Croft in 1858 was changed to ... was bred at ... with edit summary "animals are bred". Actually, animals are both bred and born. Breeding is when you put the sire to the dam and they mate; birth is when the live animal appears. These obviously do not have to be in the same town. However I don;t see a reliable source cited for either event. Cusop Dingle (talk) 07:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
added the reference which I used for the Kettledrum article: sorry it's a book. I used "born" rather than bred as I thought it would be clearer for the general reader. I get told off for using too many specialist terms and I sometimes over-compensate. In terms of Racehorses "bred" is used for the place a horse was born (or foaled) regardless of the where the conception took place: see for example Pont l'Eveque (horse) who was conceived in France but is always considered British bred because he was born there. It's also the case that the horse's official "breeder" is whoever owns the mare at the time of birth, regardless of whether they had anything to do with arranging the mating (covering): see Pinza. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 10:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Re "born" or "bred" - I'm not particularly exercised over this, so revert if there is a strong feeling against "bred". I feel that "born" is a tad sentimental for an encyclopedia when referring to animals, and that not-so-specialist term "bred" is understood by the average non-specialist reader to be synonymous with "born". As a general point, when we see "born and bred" it would be something different again, implying that "bred" could be "where brought up", which might be different place to birth. Interesting. Acabashi (talk) 15:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
"born" is a tad sentimental for an encyclopedia when referring to animals. Would "animals" include Homo Sapiens?. And yes it is very odd that "bred" has become a synonym for "brought up". I would usually always bow to usage, but in this case a useful distinction appears to have been lost. I suspect that this results from a misunderstanding of working class British English usage by ignorant University types. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 16:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Croft-on-Tees/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
Requires additional photographs e.g. bridge over riveer
Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
