Talk:Crosby & Nash

Merger proposal

I propose these two articles be merged as they appear to have the same information. I think a redirect should be made for one of the pages to help avoid future duplicate articles. Glennfcowan 00:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes. Crosby & Nash has many more links, so the other article should be merged into this one. Simon12 02:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

NO. These are two totally separate bands. While they share some commonalities, it's like saying that Wings should just be merged into the Beatles template. BoffoHijinx —Preceding comment was added at 11:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

BoffoHijinx, I agree that if the bands were different (like the Beatles/Wings) then the articles should merge. These articles appear to be for the same band (same dates, names, albums, etc.) Are you confusing Crosby and Nash with Crosby, Stills & Nash (and Young)? CSNY has a completely different article than the two in question. If there indeed is a difference, can you please elaborate? It seems the only difference I can see is the word 'and' instead of '&' in the name.--Glennfcowan 15:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

YES This is the same band with two different articles. I think that the Crosby & Nash article should be kept and the other be redirected. KitHutch 16:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC) This merger proposal was a no brainer since the same band had two articles. I went ahead and merged the articles by putting a redirect to this article, which was more complete anyway. If you object, discuss why one band should have two articles here. KitHutch 00:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Whoops...Due to a lack of sleep, I thought someone was proposing a merger between Crosby & Nash and CSNY, not Crosby and Nash and Crosby & Nash. DUH. Yes. These should be merged. Sorry about the confusion.BoffoHijinx 01:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)BoffoHijinx

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crosby & Nash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5aWxoHiRP to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Images

Does anybody have any images of Crosby and Nash together that AREN'T of them as part of the larger CSNY group? --Khajidha (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)