Talk:Cross Creek Programs

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Sources

edit

The page needs sources and excerpts from former students and graduates of the academy, with more detail into the structure of the school, such as consequences and status privileges. I attended Horizon Academy, another member of WWASP and Premier Education Systems, LLC, and thus have a working knowledge of the program, but more sources are needed for this article to be trustworthy. --Programkid (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I want to say you should probably 'give up' trying to find reliable sources. The only information there is about this place is from the magazine this association puts out. I don't think I can be counted as a reliable source; but if I can email me at sumit-gill@hotmail.com (yes thats a hyphen, not an underscore). I saw kids with scrapes and bruises after staff altercations but wasn't abused myself, mixed feelings about the place. Incredibly mixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.127.170.134 (talk) 00:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

-Haha, Sumit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.125.101.17 (talk) 23:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Helped out articles

edit

Fixed a lot of outdated stuff, and also removed some POV nonsense. Still needs a lot of work however. --Modifyrelate (talk) 03:17, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

User Deleted Page, made stub

edit

User 76.91.91.140 deleted more than 90% of the article and made it a stub. This user (according to the talk page) has done similar things to other articles, such as the Rock Lee article. Visit the user's talk page. Talk There was no reason posted on this talk page for the edit, and as such, I believe the page should be reverted. --~Programkid (talk) 17:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the content that you restored. The content was unsourced (see Wikipedia policy on the need for sources) and the extensive details about Cross Creek's disciplinary procedures are trivial "how-to" information that do not belong in an encyclopedia. (See WP:NOT.) --Orlady (talk) 03:28, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orlady, all sources come from someone writing something down. If you haven't experienced it you have no room to say what is and isn't unfounded. SO please keep your "opinions" to yourself.

New Sources

edit

Here's the story of a female teen who was forcefully moved to Cross Creek Programs. The text provides some in-depth description. http://www.reddit.com/r/troubledteens/comments/hk0xy/a_gay_teen_describes_her_experience_at_a_utah/ (see http://write.fm/t6lbdkz for an easier read). I remember reading the text of a gay teen boy a while back who was forced to Cross Creek, too, I think. I'll try to see if I can find that again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.57.211.179 (talk) 10:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Personal testimonials, particularly anonymous testimonials, are not suitable sources for encyclopedia articles. Sorry... --Orlady (talk) 14:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
In the case of an abusive area, "testimonials" are more so "evidence" especially considering there are plenty of them. Miles Kjeller (talk) 14:31, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cross Creek Programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cross Creek Programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply