Talk:Crown (dental restoration)/GA1

GA Review

This article does not fulfill the Good Article criteria at this time. Furthermore, it contains clean-up banners, {{fact}} tags, and also has an extreme lack of references, all of which points to a quick fail. Please ensure that these issues have been addressed before nominating again at WP:GAC. María (habla conmigo) 19:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

I guess you got here before I did, Maria! In that case, I will say that I completely concur with your review, Maria, and furthermore, add a few more points that need to be worked on:

• There should not be bullet points in the lead, per MOS
• Website references should have publishers and access dates
• Books should be properly formatted with publishers
• Image captions should be concise, with most material being contained in the body of the article, rather than an image caption
• MOS recommends that images be staggered right and left, rather than being stacked down the right hand side of the page.

Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 19:40, 28 August 2008 (UTC)