Talk:Croydon Central (UK Parliament constituency)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Croydon Central (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Croydon Central (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141221221640/http://croydon.greenparty.org.uk/news/2014/10/22/croydon-green-party-announces-prospective-parliamentary-candidates/ to http://croydon.greenparty.org.uk/news/2014/10/22/croydon-green-party-announces-prospective-parliamentary-candidates/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131204234541/http://www.croydon.gov.uk/democracy/dande/elections/electionresults/parliament2010 to http://www.croydon.gov.uk/democracy/dande/elections/electionresults/parliament2010
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Merge proposal
editI propose merging Croydon South (historic UK Parliament constituency) into Croydon Central (UK Parliament constituency). The pre-1974 Croydon South seat was extremely similar to the subsequent Croydon Central seat (with minor adjustments for Ward Boundaries), provides important historical context for results in Croydon Central and better conforms with naming conventions for parliamentary constituencies with regards to Croydon South (historic) and a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Croydon Central (UK Parliament Constituency).Trimfrim20 (talk) 16:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Another similar example of this is Mid Kent (UK Parliament constituency) and Mid Kent (historic UK Parliament constituency). Moondragon21 (talk) 05:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply - I think the circumstances are slightly different on this one?
- There's a gap of more than 100 years between the two seats you describe - while Croydon South (as was) was renamed Croydon Central and subject to minor boundary changes in 1974 to line it up with new ward boundaries.
- The old East Surrey was then renamed Croydon South in the same go. Trimfrim20 (talk) 11:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. I agree with your proposal. The separate Croydon South (historic UK Parliament constituency) always seemed like an anomaly to me, so your suggestion makes sense.
- Regarding the Mid Kent example raised by @Moondragon21, there are other similar situations where separate articles have not been created, including Mid Cheshire and North Northumberland re-established for the 2024 election. We should be consistent and, in these cases, I believe we should have separate "historic" articles. JSboundaryman (talk) 09:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, it should be merged with Croydon South (UK Parliament constituency). Standard practice on Wikipedia is for constituencies of the same name to have the same article regardless of how much the boundaries change; it avoids confusion. Chessrat (talk, contributions) 11:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)