Cry On has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Cry On/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MsDusa (talk · contribs) 22:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Production
- I figure it's implied that they were a new studio at the time given that it is past tense
- Multiple types of control scheme > Multiple control schemes
- "The evoking" > "The evocation"
Cancellation and legacy
- You could stand to summarize the first quotation.
That's about it.
- @MsDusa: Done. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)