Talk:Cry On

Latest comment: 3 years ago by MsDusa in topic GA Review
Good articleCry On has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 8, 2008Articles for deletionDeleted
August 22, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Cry On/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MsDusa (talk · contribs) 22:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Production

  • I figure it's implied that they were a new studio at the time given that it is past tense
  • Multiple types of control scheme > Multiple control schemes
  • "The evoking" > "The evocation"

Cancellation and legacy

  • You could stand to summarize the first quotation.

That's about it.

@MsDusa: Done. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
pog - Whadup, it's ya girl, Dusa (talk) 20:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply